1.800.651.4050 Mon-Sat 8am-5pm PT
FREE SHIPPING ON ORDERS OVER $50More info
JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Search
WISH
0
Schwalbe Aerothan 700c Tube

SchwalbeAerothan 700c Tube(Return to Product Page)

Add your own review
(56 customer reviews)
5 stars
4 stars
3 stars
2 stars
1 stars
(29)
(10)
(6)
(4)
(7)
(52%)
(18%)
(11%)
(7%)
(13%)

User submitted reviews

Review by cfadave

These tubes are worth the money!
rating
by cfadave
Chessesheadland (WI) !

Been using these instead of tubeless on my road bikes. One flat in 3 years and 15k miles. NUFF said. If you don�t want to mess w tubeless but want great ride quality, light weight, puncture resistance without the hassle of tubeless, this is it!

Reviewed 1/21/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Anonymous

46g, not 41g
rating
by Anonymous
Cycling Enthusiast
SE CT
4 of 24 customers found this review helpful.

After a lot of indecision, splurged and bought two of the Race 700 x 23/28 version. Disappointed to find that both weighed nearly 46g (45.7 and 45.9g to be precise). Substantially more than the 41g listed both in the specs and prominently on the box. Hoped that the scale was off. Fresh batteries, re-calibrated. Nope, not the scale.

Schwalbe tech rep says that lower weight is less important than reduced rolling resistance and greater puncture resistance. CyclingTips' posted data shows that Aerothans have slightly more rolling resistance than latex and slightly less than Conti Supersonic. As for puncture resistance, it's always seemed like that should be in the tires rather than the tubes (though resistance to tearing while mounting is always welcome).

Still, one expects that a product which is (a) made in Germany and (b) so expensive would be closer to spec. If that's impossible, a weight range should be given.

They're still in the box, so my one star rating doesn't mean much. Haven't decided whether to use them or return for credit.

Reviewed 3/19/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Pat

Terrific tubes until you get a puncture
rating
by Pat
Cycling Enthusiast
Dallas
8 of 8 customers found this review helpful.

Pros: lightweight, packs small, holds air very well, perfect for seat-pack spares

Cons: Cannot be permanently patched with any patch material currently on the market. I've tried Tubolito, slime, and Park patches. Nothing works. Schwalbe says you must use their patch kit, but I've never tried it because these are not available anywhere. Until Schwalbe makes their patch kits as widely available as the tubes, these can only used as a seat-pack spare (unless you want to throw away a $30 tube with each puncture). Note: Tubolito patches work great for a while, but after a few months they eventually fail.

Reviewed 3/12/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Lauren500

light but not reliable
rating
by Lauren500
Cycling Enthusiast
Bellevue, Wa

Same experience as Aaron below. These are light but not reliable. My valve blew out after pumping it about 80 psi and thread ruined and not able to hold air literally after 2 rides. Won't be buying this again.

Reviewed 12/7/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Knight

Game Changer
rating
by Knight
Missouri

I will never use a "normal" tube again! It is a phenomenal improvement. It frees up so much space in your Jersey or bag, and they really are puncture resistant. The also prefer them to their orange competition. Cannot recommend enough!

Reviewed 5/14/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Anonymous

Terrific ultralight durable tube
rating
by Anonymous
Cycling Enthusiast
Dallas, TX
5 of 5 customers found this review helpful.

Lighter than latex, and it holds air better than butyl, with virtually no pressure loss between rides. Some reviewers have said they're hard to repair, but in my experience punctures are easily repaired using either the Schwalbe or Tubilito patch kits that are specifically made for thermoplastic tubes. They are great to carry in the flat kit since they are light weight and take up much less space than butyl or latex.

Reviewed 1/18/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Jay Anderson

Not sealant compatible
rating
by Jay Anderson
Cycling Enthusiast
Tahoe & Santa Cruz Mountains
5 of 9 customers found this review helpful.

I bought this to use as a spare on my tubeless gravel bike. However, the paperwork that comes with it says not to get it in contact with sealant. So, it is useless for my purposes. I bought lightweight tubes from another company that do not have this issue.

Reviewed 12/10/2020
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Anonymous

Repeated valve core issues
rating
by Anonymous
Competitive Racer
2 of 2 customers found this review helpful.

Big TPU fan. Use Pirelli's on my disc break, was pumped to find Aerothan's are rated for rim.

However - I've repeated issues with valve core, which is loose and can be easily unscrewed. 1st tube couldn't hold high pressures. My 3rd tube held pressure fine using a floor pump, but any hand pump that screws on can easily unscrew the valve core, which releases all the air. I learned the hard way in the middle of nowhere on a ride.

I've superglued the valve core - hope that helps. But Schwalbe - why am I doing the engineering for you?

Reviewed 7/18/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Anonymous

poorly made product with great potential
rating
by Anonymous
Daily Commuter
chicago, il
2 of 2 customers found this review helpful.

There are plenty of reviews here that express the issues that I have had with these - the valve stems are made from plastic rather than metal and are absolutely not up to the task required of them. I've ridden approximately 200 miles with them at this point, and I have to say the tube itself is incredible and provides a great ride quality while also noticeably reducing rolling resistance, but the valve stems immediately started letting air out (even at ~80psi). I probably WOULD buy them again, but I think the first thing I'd do would be to replace the valve core with a higher quality one (the threading on the original valve is VERY fine which I think exacerbates the problem) wrap that in pfte tape, and then dab a very small amount of glue around the valve core threads so it couldn't go anywhere.

Reviewed 7/17/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Phil

Great tube - Horrible stem
rating
by Phil
Cycling Enthusiast
central NYS
3 of 3 customers found this review helpful.

Generally, I agree with other reviews, very light, easy to install, great ride, excellent air retention.

I have ridden several hundred miles and had no flat issues on two bikes.

The valve stem is absolutely terrible!!!

Difficult to add air with a standard hand pump. valve core can easily dislodge and make the tube unusable. I don't know if I would purchase again due to the almost dysfunctional stem, but I would definitely buy if they had a quality stem, even if they were slightly higher cost over their already high price.

Reviewed 5/14/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by SHBiker

Lesson Learned...
rating
by SHBiker
Cycling Enthusiast
Upstate NY
11 of 13 customers found this review helpful.

Bought 3 of them at the beginning of May. All 3, yes all 3, are toast now.

Tube 1 developed an air bubble in one spot during installation, stretching the material irreparably before the tire was even on (apparently there's a warning against overinflation prior to mounting,written in tiny print in the install guide??).Tube 2, mounted on the rear under a Conti GP5000 in 28mm, punctured after 150 miles.Tube 3, mounted on the rear under a Conti GP 4 seasons in 32mm, punctured after 200 miles (300 miles total on this tube, if you count the 100 miles when it was on the front before I switched it to the rear). As other reviewers have noted, the Schwalbe Glueless Patches can't be found anywhere! So I'm stuck with two broken tubes that I'll probably never bother to fix, given my lack of trust in these tubes now, and what I've heard about the Glueless Patches not always working well.

This was no scientific experiment, so my results are by no means objective, and I may have just had a run of bad luck (I think I was tempting the Flat Gods when I bought these tubes because I was on a 3000-mile no-flat streak with basic butyl tubes (Bontragers and Michelin Airstop A2s with different set-ups)). That being said, I will never purchase Schwalbe Aerothan tubes again. Schwalbe, if you're listening, lower the price by at least half and I will MAYBE consider buying them again, because, as much as I hate to admit it, I did like riding them and I feel like the lower weight and slightly lower rolling resistance was noticeable.

My next tire/wheel upgrade will probably be going tubeless (in which case my Aerothans, if I ever am able to patch them, will be even more useless, because, as Schwalbe notes in the fine print of their Aerothan packaging, the tubes can't come into contact with Tubeless sealant - so much for a light spare tube lol).

Reviewed 6/13/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by DaveJ

I am a fan of these tubes, they are very light weight and pretty durable. My only complaint is they are difficult to patch.
rating
by DaveJ
Cycling Enthusiast
Northern Minnesota

Love them ecept that they are hard to find a patck kit for them that bonds to the tube.

Reviewed 7/20/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Mlab

Quality tube
rating
by Mlab
MS Gulf Coast

These tubes change your bike's ride in a good way. Lightweight and stable, also surprisingly durable. The only drawback is the price - 3x the cost of butyl tubes.

Reviewed 7/10/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by SG_BMC

No more puncture prone than regular butyl tubes
rating
by SG_BMC
Cycling Enthusiast
SG
3 of 3 customers found this review helpful.

Expensive but I was surprised it felt a noticeably better/smoother ride with these tubes. I did have a pinch flat but it was from a pothole. Didnt think a cheap butyl tube could do better in that situation. I used the Park Tool GP-2 patch since the Schwalbe patch is impossible to find and the patch is holding up well after 2k miles. Just make sure surfaces are super clean before applying the patch. I also had 30mm valve extenders fixed on these tubes and no leaks whatsoever. Will get couple more spares when they are back in stock and on sale.

Reviewed 2/21/2022
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Aaron

First good, then very very bad
rating
by Aaron
Los Angeles
9 of 12 customers found this review helpful.

Look, I put these tubes in for a race, and they were a dream. Very light, and they rode unbelievably, I couldn't believe what a difference they made in the ride. Then a couple rides later I get TWO PINCH FLATS IN THE SAME RIDE 15 miles apart, leaves me with a 2 mile walk of shame. That was just the beginning. I can only use their special patches, right? For TWO MONTHS I look everywhere, nobody has them in stock. TWO MONTHS! So I finally give in last week and my the Park Tools glueless patches. They actually seem to work pretty well, but I'll never know because as I'm getting everything repaired and ready to ride, my valve literally BLOWS OUT of the plastic (yes, plastic) valve stem. Threads are ruined, won't hold a valve or an extender in the stem. Trash. Waste of money. Don't think I'll waste my time trying to install the other aerothan that I repaired.

Reviewed 11/16/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by bikerguy

A spare tube have not used it.
rating
by bikerguy
Cycling Enthusiast
midwest
0 of 1 customers found this review helpful.

Put them in saddle bag as spare.

Reviewed 4/27/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Anonymous

light and durable!
rating
by Anonymous
Cycling Enthusiast
San Francisco, CA
1 of 1 customers found this review helpful.

Obviously a little pricy, but they do seem to last longer than standard tubes. A great way to save on rolling resistance and weight!

Reviewed 7/19/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by kook43

Much better stem than other thermoplastic competition
rating
by kook43
Competitive Racer
St. Louis, MO
5 of 5 customers found this review helpful.

Been running Latex for racing/training since I can remember, great feel, fast, light, etc. Switched to the competition, to shed a few grams and have a more compact spare, let's call them "Orange" and was happy until I realized their fatal flaw, the stem.

Touch it with anything, add extenders for deep carbon rims, change the valve for any reason, and bammm instant failure, leak, crack, non-seal. These Aerothan's are waaaaaay different. The stem is actually the focus, and works 100% so far in my usage. Just as light, just as good, with far better engineering.

I'm a fan of the Schwalbe Aerothan.

Reviewed 7/16/2021
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by JTCarberry

MUST HAVE LOCKING HEAD PUMP
rating
by JTCarberry
Cycling Enthusiast
Berkeley, CA
1 of 2 customers found this review helpful.

Don't buy this if you don't have a locking head pump. Threaded head pumps do not work - the top of the valve stem comes off when you remove the pump head after pumping.

Reviewed 4/15/2023
Thank you for your feedback.

Review by Anonymous

lightweight
rating
by Anonymous
Cycling Enthusiast
Oakland, CA
6 of 7 customers found this review helpful.

These tubes are lighter than latex and much lighter than butyl.

Installation was no problem and each size covers a useful range of tire sizes.

They retain air better than latex but not as well as standard butyl. Mine lose about 10% per week.

I've had 2 flats, both were slow leaks from tiny holes. I couldn't find Schwalbe patches but was able to repair the tubes with Park glueless patches. I cleaned the hole area thoroughly then pressed the patch on by rolling a socket wrench over it with lots of force. They hold air as well as unpatched tubes.

I like these better than Tubolito. Mostly I've had problems getting patches to hold on Tubolito. Also the Aerothan seem lighter and more flexible (and I don't have to look at orange valve stems).

Reviewed 6/17/2021
Thank you for your feedback.