Description Touch Screen Compatibility in a Midweight Cycling Glove — AmFIB Lite Glove
When it comes to cycling through the fall and winter, you should expect a midweight glove that has fantastic insulating warmth as well as incredible handlebar feel. Instead of choosing between both, the PEARL iZUMi AmFIB® Lite Glove decided to provide the best of both worlds with these gloves fit for just about any cyclist.
A construction of 60g Primaloft Gold with Crosscore technology is applied to the back of the hand for ultra-comfortable insulation. Added Aerogel particles are included for maximum warmth with minimal bulk, perfect for a ride through cold weather. To maintain the midweight feel, the Ax Suede Laredo palm remains insulation-free for a cycling glove that protects you from the elements — but not the feel of the bike. This allows for the glove to be just as grippy as it is durable. The main body features the AmBIF® Softshell for excellent wind blocking qualities with incredible dexterity.
With an insulated glove this sensitive, stay warm throughout your ride without losing the feeling of the bike at your fingertips. The PEARL iZUMi AmFIB® Lite Glove is amazing for autumn and spring rides, as the midweight body keeps your hands just the right temperature no matter how much wind you may encounter. With touch screen compatible fingertips and surprisingly waterproof durability, treat yourself to the cycling glove that you've been waiting for.
Features:
60g Primaloft Gold w/Crosscore technology insulation, which is made from 35% post-consumer recycled polyester and incorporates Aerogel particles for maximum warmth with minimal bulk
AmFIB® Softshell back of hand fabric protects from wind and water
Ax Suede Laredo synthetic leather palm for durability and great grip
Touch screen compatible index finger and thumbs
Back composed of 87% polyester, 8% nylon, 4% polyurethane, and 1% spandex
Palm composed of 77% polyester, 17% polyurethane, and 6% nylon
Lining composed of 100% polyester
B-Stock - This product has one or more B-Stock units available. These units can be purchased at a discount (see option select). B-Stock units were returned from other customers and may have missing or damaged packaging materials. These units are otherwise as new. The full manufacturer warranty applies. Click Here for more information.
Reviews Ordered by Most Relevant First
5 stars
4 stars
3 stars
2 stars
1 stars
Nice but more like lightweight
They are nice gloves but proved to be too cold at around 32 degrees, they are not great if there is any wind at all. Probably great at above 36 degrees.
Reviewed 1/11/2021
Was this review useful to you?
Yes /
No Thank you for your feedback.
Thin and Precise
by AM
Cycling Enthusiast
Central Oregon
Bought these for temps in the 40s but they don't work well for me when it's that low. They do work well in the 50s (for me). -I do have cold hands so take my opinion FWIW.
The issue is the design. It has some noticeable insulation on the back which works but nothing on the palm side. I am sure that sounded good at the design meeting but....ever hold cold bars? Yeah, it comes right through. Duh!
Reviewed 3/31/2022
Was this review useful to you?
Yes /
No Thank you for your feedback.
Pearle iZumi AmFIB Lite Gloves are an excellent fit providing awesome protection!
by SFESL
Cycling Enthusiast
Germantown, TN
Finally, cold weather arrived and a true test for the Pearle iZumi AmFBI gloves. To coin the phrase, "fits like a glove", easy on/off and kept my hands warm. The gloves are light and have a comfortable feel on the hand. Able to use to the Garmin as well as the phone while wearing the gloves. The materials to construct the gloves are of quality, no complaints. They are replacing an old pair of Pearl Izumi gloves that have lasted five years.
Reviewed 12/23/2020
Was this review useful to you?
Yes /
No Thank you for your feedback.
Not very warm
by Anonymous
Cycling Enthusiast
Georgia
0 of 1 customers found this review helpful.
I have Raynaud's syndrome (cold hands). I bought these as an outer layer for my electric gloves. They don't work well for that purpose. They might work okay for other purposes.
Reviewed 2/28/2022
Was this review useful to you?
Yes /
No Thank you for your feedback.
